.
Here on the left is Will Alsop, who has just joined the architecture firm RMJM. The other guy is Peter Morrison, who heads RMJM (one of the worlds largest architecture firms). More on him below. Thats Will’s work on the wall, a surprisingly recessive choice for him, but perfect for this ‘not scaring off the clients’ type press release photo.
This post will all look a bit insular to architects (and not all of them either), but thats far from how it really is. There is a premonition here for all architects and also, perhaps more optimistically, for everyone else (as long as their position is/ their drawings are strong enough to survive the process).
In short, big architecture companies are buying up what they consider to be art talent (and I don’t even mean architecture talent). This gives an edge in a crowded market, some credibility and generally chimes with the general mood of things.
Will is first and foremost an artist and if somebody paid him to be that all day, paid his creative team (thats assistants and one or two architects, possibly) and took his troublesome business off his hands, then he’ll be happy as Larry.
The problem lies with the separation of the design and the delivery aspects of the work. Handing the birth of the architecture over to the apparent non-designers, whilst maintaining the early concept work within an elite team is a worrying move. Whilst this may be very exciting for artists who can now perhaps get a bit more involved, it’s quite worrying for architects who may increasingly find themselves getting cut out of the design process, and being reduced to being technicians.
In reality, the person or team who draw the drawings actually designs the building. This is because the concept art, (if it has not been made very specifically to represent the building) might not be visually similar to what the client actually wants (and the people who have to provide what the client wants are the people who actually draw the end product). If there is a mismatch between the concept artwork and the actual client expectations and if the architects are are any less good designers than the originators of the concept (and there is absolutely no guarantee here that they will be as good), then there is going to be a less good end product.
There is a place for art and sculpture in architecture (and vice versa) and that to an extent is what this blog is about. I’m really happy for Will and I love him. There is just something about the look on the Morrison’s face in the photo that worries me.
In March 2008 he went on the record saying:
“At RMJM, while we have many great architects, we believe that no single architect is bigger than the collective process we embrace.”
And much more.
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3109766
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3109775
Uh oh.
RMJM had a stormy (quote: BD) relationship with Enrique Miralles and there is more evidence of a certain lack of respect for so-called ‘starchitects’. One would assume that Will would be aware of this, but he is still taking the money, so it’s hard to see what’s going on.
Great photoshopping of the fag out of Will’s hand, by the way. Did they really have to do that? Everyone knows Will smokes and drinks, so why start trying to make him look all clean cut now?
Watch out, Will. You may not be as in control of your images as you think you are.
.
ikea
October 11, 2009the eighth circle of hell
Posted in notes | 1 Comment »
Tags: architecture, commentary, constraints, dreams, images, language, words